Electronic Warfare Non-Hearing

Electronic Warfare Non-Hearing

30 minutes

Representatives of the U. S. Navy and U. S. Forest Service faced a very tough crowd at a public meeting held in the Port Angeles City Council Chambers on the evening of Thursday, Nov. 5.   People had come in droves from as far away as Oak Harbor, Port Townsend, and Sequim.  There were rumors that a large contingent from Forks had not shown up only because there were trees down, blocking the highway over by Lake Crescent that stormy night.  It’s probably just as well they couldn’t make it, though, because as it was, every seat in the large hall was filled, people were sitting on the floor and standing wherever they could find room at the back, and the crowd extended out into the foyer all the way to the front doors.  There was no more room.

The subject of the meeting was a Navy application for a Forest Service permit to use remote logging roads for mobile electro-magnetic emitter trucks that Growler  aircraft from Naval Air Station Whidbey Island would seek out in cat-and mouse war games for up to 16 hours a day on as many as 260 days a year.  The nationally-sanctified "Square-inch of Silence" would be violated, as would be the peace and quiet of the Olympic National Park and Olympic National Forest.   But the Environmental Assessment gave no consideration to those effects.

The meeting had been requested by Sixth District Congressman Derek Kilmer when citizens contacted him to object to the lack of opportunity for public input after the Forest Service initially quietly rubber-stamped the plan in mid-September.   

The comment period was at first extended to October 31^st and a crowded public hearing was held in Forks, but so many people requested another extension that this meeting had been scheduled, and the comment deadline set back to November 28.  And so it was that there were loud expressions of dismay and even threats to walk out when the announcement was made that the evening's proceedings would not be made part of the public record:

The deadline for commenting on the Electronic Warfare Plan is November 28.  

The full Pacific Northwest EW Range Environmental Assessment is available by searching the web for that title. Comments should be addressed to Greg Wahl, Forest Environmental Coordinator, Olympic National Forest, 1835 Black Lake Blvd SW, Olympia, WA 98512, or can be sent by email gtwahl@fs.fed.us. 

But for the Grace of God

We talk with a local reporter who, but for some fluke of fortune, might easily have met the same grisly fate as Islamic State of Iraq and Syria beheading victim James Foley, in an interview that ties American involvement in the Middle East to global warming…and life in Port Townsend!

But for the Grace of God
29 minutes

Robot Futures

A talk with perhaps the world’s foremost expert on robotics and artificial intelligence about everything from the future of driverless cars to the ethics of the development of autonomous weapons systems.

Robot Futures
30 minutes

Solar Power Trip

A talk with the founder and president of a company that has been key in making Port Townsend the city with the most rooftop solar power plants per capita in Washington State. But are we pushing the limit on new installations?

Solar Power Trip
30 minutes

Climate Refugees

A noted investigative journalist explains why he and his wife have recently moved to Port Townsend as “climate refugees”…and outlines the profile of the coming global calamity climate scientists now almost unanimously agree is probably inevitable.

Climate Refugees
30 minutes

Double M Ranch

What do vintage British automobiles, custom electric guitars, tube amplifiers, a man who as a boy was good at building with blocks, and one of Port Townsend’s most popular restaurants have in common?  The answer lies at the Double M Ranch:

Double M Ranch
30 minutes

Whidbey Growlers

Activists from Whidbey Island talk about what they see as the Navy’s escalating militarization of the Northern Puget Sound and its consequences, with responses from not one, but TWO Navy public affairs officers.

Whidbey Growlers
30 minutes

The U.S. Navy's Marine Messes

Two stories of the U.S. Navy running afoul of the marine environment, and of the effects on marine mammals—and a local shellfish farmer:

U.S. Navy's Marine Messes
30 minutes

Bigfoot and the Sasquatch Genome Project

I talk with a former police detective who not only claims to have seen Bigfoot TWICE, but who also helped supply genetic evidence to prove the existence of the creatures that most believe to be a myth:

Bigfoot and the Sasquatch Genome Project

30 minutes

Trouble with Statins

In 1987, the first of a new class of powerful cholesterol-inhibiting drugs collectively known as statins was introduced to the market.  By 2005, more than ten percent of the American public had been prescribed some version of the drug, and with sales pushing $20 billion annually, statins had become by far the biggest-selling pharmaceuticals of all time. 

The drug industry has consistently touted the safety and benefits of the drug, and pushed steadily to have what was originally conceived to be for the use only of those at high risk of heart disease approved by the FDA as a general preventative.  There was even talk not too long ago of adding it to the water supply, like fluoride.

But problems with statins have surfaced. It was known from early studies that statins could cause muscle aches and weakness, and in rare instances a severe muscle wasting disease known as rhabdomyolysis—which could be fatal.   But then, in 2001, the statin drug cerivastatin was withdrawn from the market by Bayer A.G. when some 52 fatal cases of rhabdomyolysis were reported resulting from its use.  Other  problems that weren’t noticed in the early clinical trials also were increasingly being reported in the real world, including memory loss, cognitive problems, neuropathy, and pancreatic, liver, and sexual dysfunction.  Then last year the FDA forced manufacturers to label the drugs as increasing risk of diabetes...one of the indicators for its use.

But prescribing statins is now standard treatment for elevated levels of LDL—the so-called “bad cholesterol,” and doctors who fail to follow the guidelines by prescribing it are liable for malpractice suits.  With the powerful pharmaceutical industry watching out for its commercial interests, doctors have been reluctant to express  worries they may have about the steady expansion in use of what some are starting to consider a dangerous drug. 

But some have started to speak out.  One of those is Dr. Barbara H. Roberts, director of the Women’s Cardiac Center at Miriam Hospital in Rhode Island, whose book The Truth About Statins: Risks and Alternatives to Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs was published last year by Pocket Books. 

In the introduction to her book, Dr. Roberts wrote that “In exposing the shoddy science that underlies many of the guidelines that doctors are told they must follow in treating their patients, and in exposing the rampant conflicts of interest among the FDA, Big Pharma, medical scientists, medical centers, and professional medical organizations, I risk being declared a pariah in the medical community.” 

In a phone interview, I asked Dr. Roberts why she decided to take that risk:

The Trouble with Statins

24 minutes